How Chloe Has Changed (And Why Sully Doesn't Like It)

by Sullivan Lane [s

OK, so pretty much anyone who reads my blog and fanfic and message board posts (back in the day when I used to care about posting) knows that I'm a Chloe fan. Usually, they're Chloe fans too. Not necessarily a Clark/Chloe fan, but we're all in it for the Snarky Torchy Journalistic Flippy-Haired Monster. (That's my new name for her. You likes?)

That said, I couldn't stand her in "Vortex." I thought she was out of character in "Heat." I long for the days of "Craving," "Shimmer" and "Hug." When I liked Chloe. And even "Tempest" when I didn't like her but I concede that she was in character. Heat!Chloe and Vortex!Chloe were replaced with cheap imitations.

Let me explain. All through first season, our love for the flippy-haired girl grew. Why? She's real. She's got passion for something other than boy bands and makeup. She's devoted to the Torch, and she knows what she wants out of life. Although some teenagers would say that she acts like an adult, I also know other teenager who relate to FirstSeason!Chloe.

And you know, underneath all that passion, determination and "get the hell out of my way" attitude, Chloe's got vulnerability and flaws. The sarcasm is a defense mechanism, and she recognizes that it gets out of control. Onscreen, FirstSeason!Chloe was this bundle of energy and curiosity while just under the surface, there was pining for Clark and trying to just get over that in her own private way.

This is what made Chloe unique, and it's why so many fans fell in love with her.

"Vortex" has got Chloe half-heartedly looking for Bo Kent. Um, no. First of all, no matter what had happened the night before, Chloe would push all of that aside to pursue the story. And hey, weren't there meteor fragments up in that crypt? Why wasn't Chloe all over that fact? I don't like Chloe preoccupied with her Clark feelings; it's a very Lana approach to the situation. I don't think it's true to her character to be spewing all this angst to Pete and commiserating with Lana either. The Chloe I knew in first season would have sucked it up and pushed those feelings out of the way. She is prone to dealing with things through anger ("Most men are from Mars, Clark, but you're from some distant galaxy no one's ever heard of!") than tears.

SecondSeason!Chloe is no different from any other teenage girl on the WB.

Next to Lex, Chloe was the one character the writers treated right last season. Sure, they made her the resident whipping girl by pushing her out of a window and dangling her from the ceiling. Allison Mack's been shafted when it comes to publicity, even though the latter half of the season we sometimes got more Allison screen time than Kristin, who is the female lead. Mack has also been enthusiastic when she talks about the show, expressing genuine concern about her character's direction in the show. It means that she's invested in the show and her character, and it seemed that the writers felt the same way, too, especially in the last three episodes.

But all that's been thrown out the window.

I have a theory. I know the writers read what the fans say. Not as meticulously as other fans do, but they know. They have a general idea. There are more Internet fans who favor Chloe to Lana, which was not the intention. So the writers switched their personalities: SecondSeason!Chloe is more simpering, pathetic; Lana became more curious about Clark (which had always been Chloe territory in first season) and less ... well, stupid. (She actually thought to call 911 when the fire started. I nearly screamed "Hallelujah, her brain's still working!")

This switcheroo ploy may have worked if the characters had changed, say, after the first two or three episodes of Season 1. We may not have cared. (I probably wouldn't have liked Chloe as much, but that's neither here nor there.) But we've come to know the characters for 21 episodes. To do a schizophrenic attitude change after the summer hoping no one would notice is baffling. And it assumes we have short attention spans. (I guess some people do, but again, neither here nor there.)

Hey, writers: Don't mess up a good thing. We want FirstSeason!Chloe back, dammit.

back to rants